The Bertie Park consultation will be on 1st November 3.45 – 8.00 p.m. at South Oxford Community Centre in Lake Street.
All households in the area have received a leaflet (here). Oxford City Council choose their words carefully. It took them a month to agree wording for postcards delivered in February. Here is a guide to understanding the leaflet:
It looks like an information evening, but this is the only consultation we will get.
The Save Bertie campaign has organised an opportunity for everyone to discuss the proposals and put together a community response. This will be on November 9th from 8.00 – 9.00p.m. at St Luke’s Church in Canning Crescent. Anna Railton, Naomi Waite, Rick Tanner and Deborah Glass-Woodin will also be there.
“The reason (Bertie Park) was considered above other parks in the city was because it was previously a landfill site so was designated as a Brownfield site – a site that had previously been developed. The site was also allocated for development before any play equipment had been installed”.
Statement relayed to the campaign 18.10.22
There are a couple of problems with this.
Bertie Park recreation ground has been part of our community since 1938. Local residents say it has always had play equipment, except during the war when it was used as allotments.
Bertie Park is not a brownfield site. The council’s own definition of brownfield land “excludes open spaces and land where the remains of previous use have blended into the landscape, or have … amenity use and cannot be regarded as requiring development”. 2036 Local Plan. p217
OCC did not use waste for landfill in this area, but land-raising to prevent flooding. It is not fair that our area can’t have a recreation ground simply because most of it is built on landfill.
If Bertie Park was “considered above other parks”, this means OCC considered building on other parks and recreation grounds as a way to solve Oxford’s housing crisis. If they build on Bertie, which recreation ground will be next?
Action by your local Labour Councillor has ensured that proposals will include a playground and multi-use games area on the main site, as well as improved community open space on the adjoining land behind Wytham Street
“Hinksey Park News”
People wonder why residents at this end of the Hinksey Park ward are trying to stop the council building social housing on a “tiny little recreation ground”.
The local plan says planning permission will only be given if the recreation ground is moved.
But it is not possible to move the recreation ground. The police say site B is not safe for unaccompanied children. And it floods. Our local councillors have not ensured that the playground and multi-use games area will stay on the main site. Without this, the council won’t get planning permission. The only thing that they can move is the green space!
So the Labour Party is now saying that site B will become a “community open space”. What does this mean?
We already have social housing in this area. There is a desperate need for more. But even kids in social housing deserve a safe place to play. Don’t they?
The Labour Party says their candidate Anna Railton “will push for more truly affordable and council homes with play areas”.
Council policy is that play areas should be surrounded by buffer zones.
Bertie Park is a recreation ground. It has two play areas and a grassy buffer zone.
Everyone knows that Bertie Park Recreation ground is threatened. Anna will push for play areas, but what about recreation grounds? We have asked Anna about the difference between a recreation ground and a play area. She hasn’t replied yet.
The buffer zone is used for many different activities. If they build on the whole of Bertie’s buffer zone, what about free play? Why can’t kids at our end of the ward have a bit of grass to play on?
Free play on Bertie Park
If Anna will only push for play areas, which recreation ground will they build on next?
I am Annie, and I am 11 years old. I really like Bertie Park. I go there almost every day. I find it very calming, and it feels like a safe place to be outside. I like to listen to music, go really high on the swings, and relax there.
As well as going on my own, I hang out with my friends there loads, and we really enjoy it. It is convenient, and there aren’t really any other places to hang out near enough. During lockdown when there was nowhere to go, me and two of my friends went nearly every day. The green space is also really good, we use it a lot to play games such as ‘it’ and have water fights. I personally usually stay in the playground, but the grassy area is very popular with the younger people who go there, such as my brother and his friends. It also has very good blackberries along the edge. The football/basketball/cricket pitch is also very useful, I practised bike riding and over arm bowling in it. Almost everyday after school there would be a football match or some people practising basketball there. The playground itself is also fantastic, with the basket swing and swings almost always being occupied, while the climbing frame is great for dodgeball. We once fitted 11 people onto the basket swing!
Without it, it would be very hard for a lot of my friends to meet up, as a lot of us can’t or don’t like to go to others houses, and also it would mean there wouldn’t be any outdoor places very locally that children mainly enjoy, so a lot of children would go outdoors a lot less, which would be bad for their mental health.
Imagine you want a child to sleep before the baby sitter arrives. Don’t ask if they want to go to bed. The answer will be no. Ask a different question instead like: “Which bed-time story shall I read?” This is more likely to get them to do what you want.
What has this got to do with the Bertie consultation?
The council won’t ask us if they can build on our recreation ground. The answer will be no. Instead, they will ask how they can turn the waste-land behind Wytham Street into a wonderful community space.
Police and parents say that the waste-land is not safe for unaccompanied children. Parents with kids playing on Bertie cannot even see it! How could it be a replacement for the green space/buffer zone?
View of Bertie Park from the Waste Land
Click here for what happened in the last “consultation”. Click here for a quick summary of the other issues.
This beautiful heart appeared on Bertie Park a couple of weeks ago
Our address to council on Monday 18th (read here) received good applause from councillors. In reply, Alex Hollingworth said what he always says (read here). He also said that the consultation will take place this autumn.
Once again, Bertie Park featured in the Labour newsletter. Naomi Waite said:
As ever, I’m committed to supporting our community spaces …. Our community will face some difficult issues over the coming years. The plans to build social housing next to the playground and multi-games area in Bertie Park will be brought forward for consultation in the coming months.
As Bertie park is the only community space at the southern end of the ward. It is clear which part of the Hinksey Park ward will “face some difficult issues”!
Naomi has offered to find out why they chose to build on Bertie Park in the first place, and which other recreation grounds were considered.
She said that she wasn’t sure what she thought about buffer zones (i.e. the green space on our recreation ground), but said that she would find out how many of the council’s playgrounds have buffer zones.
Oxford desperately needs homes. Cllr Hollingsworth has told us:
It’s my view and the view of this Council that we – the current generation fortunate enough to live in this wonderful city – should do our best to make sure that our children both have places to play in their childhood AND the hope of being able to live in Oxford when they grow up and want to have children of their own.
Cllr Alex Hollingsworth
What do the council mean by “places to play”? The sacrifice that they are asking our children to make would mean a recreation ground without a blade of grass and a nature trail that neither police or local parents think is safe for unaccompanied children.
OCC say that they do not intend to provide homes for families within the city centre because the land is too expensive. If they are going to export their housing to this ward, we also need a safe place for our children to run and shout and play.
Bertie Park was mentioned in some Labour leaflets, but it was not on the ballot paper.
Some of our campaign members would never vote anything but Labour. The Labour Party has been in power in Oxford for so long that it can now govern by decree. Oxford City Council members refuse to meet with us, to keep us updated or engage with our arguments. If something is mentioned in a leaflet, candidates are obliged to support it. But it doesn’t mean that it is right. Or that it is legal.